Ferdinand Magellan Did Not Die at the Hands of Lapu-Lapu - Batangas History, Culture and Folklore Ferdinand Magellan Did Not Die at the Hands of Lapu-Lapu - Batangas History, Culture and Folklore

Ferdinand Magellan Did Not Die at the Hands of Lapu-Lapu

[Author's note: Although this is not a Batangas-specific article, its premise should be of interest not only to enthusiasts of Batangas History in particular but also of Philippine History in general.]

Ask Google the question “how did Magellan die” and based on this exact text search string, the search engine will confidently declare that the Portuguese explorer’s cause of death was a “stab wound.” It will be difficult to blame Google because this will exactly what many think — that Magellan was killed; i.e. at the hands of Lapu-lapu, by way of either a lance or a sword. Many Filipinos would have gotten this notion from Social Science books depicting that historic battle at Mactan, Cebu in late April of 1521.

In fact, according to the Spanish chronicler Joaquín Martínez de Zúñiga, there was more to Magellan’s death than being merely mortally stabbed by Lapu-lapu. De Zuñiga wrote that Magellan “was wounded with an arrow, and died on the field with six other Spaniards, the rest saving themselves by flight.1

However, de Zuñiga’s book offered not much further in terms of information about Magellan’s death. This is hardly surprising because obviously, a Spanish writer early in the 19th century would not want to dwell on an incident when a representative of the King of Spain was killed by an Indio, i.e. a native Filipino.

The best way to learn more about the matter, therefore, was to take a peek at the journals of the Venetian chronicler Antonio Pigafetta. Pigafetta was one of just eighteen men who returned to Spain in 1522 on a ship captained by Juan Sebastian Elcano from an estimated 240 who had sailed out with Magellan three years before to explore the Far East. It was from Pigafetta’s journal that historians were able to fairly accurately reconstruct Magellan’s voyage to the Far East.2

Battle of Mactan
Artistic depiction of the Battle of Mactan.  Image credit: By Nmcast at English Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=10357771.
The journal tells us that Magellan sailed into the port of Zubu (Cebu) on 7 April 1521 to obtain provisions. The King of Zubu had told him that he had “come at a good time,” but that it was the custom for visiting ships to pay tribute. Magellan, through an interpreter, replied that since he represented a great king (of Spain), he did not pay tribute, adding that if the king (of Zubu) wanted peace, he would have peace; and if war, then war.

This must have sounded particularly ominous to the King of Zubu because the Spanish ships had fired artillery as they arrived, ostensibly as a customary greeting when arriving at a new port. The locals, including the king, were however terrified; and had to be reassured through an interpreter that the visitors had arrived just to trade.

Thereafter, the King of Zubu agreed not only that Magellan did not have to pay tribute but also let the latter know that he was willing to become his friend and formalize this by way of a blood compact. Magellan agreed. Thus, peace was made between the Spaniards and Zubu.

While it was the King of Zubu’s nephew who first became fascinated by the Christian religion and signified his wish to be baptized and instructed in the teachings of Christianity, before long the king himself embraced the new religion and was baptised. Likewise, 500 of his men were baptised along with him.

Pigafetta’s journal gave the King of Zubu’s name as “Raia Humabon.” At his baptism, Magellan gave him the name Don Carlo after the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire. Because of his conversion, the villages and hamlets (small communities) under his domain along with their petty chiefs converted and became Christians, too.

That is, except the chief of a village on the nearby island of Matan (Mactan) whose name, according to Pigafetta, was Cilapulapu (Jose Rizal later conjectured that this was probably “Si Lapulapu.3”). This chieftain alone among those who were supposed to be under Raia Humabon’s jurisdiction refused to convert to Christianity or to recognise the King of Spain as his sovereign.

On the 27th of April, Magellan heeded a call for help by another chieftain on Matan whose name was Zula, against his rival Cilapulapu. Magellan’s war party consisted of sixty men loaded onto three boats. His decision to engage Cilapulapu ultimately turned out to be foolhardy because, by Pigafetta’s estimate, there were 1,500 enemies waiting for them in Matan.

There were rocks approaching the beach where the battle took place, so the boats could not get any closer to shore. Magellan’s war party, therefore, had to wade in water to approach. While they had muskets and crossbows with them, these turned out to be useless. There were mortars on the boat, but these were of no use, either, because the boats were too far out.

Magellan was first wounded by a “poisoned arrow” shot through his leg. The Spaniards were protected by their helmets and corselets, a type of body armour; and so their enemies from Matan quickly realised that their arrows were put to better use shooting down at the legs.

Magellan’s order was for his troops to slowly retire. Instead, most of them fled, leaving behind only six to eight men to stand by him. Pigafetta described the ensuing scenario:

“So we continued to retire for more than a good crossbow flight (probably the distance covered by an arrow when shot from a crossbow) from the shore always fighting up to our knees in the water. The natives continued to pursue us, and picking up the same spear four or six times, hurled it at us again and again.”
Magellan and the men who stayed behind with him continued to fight for another hour even if they were outnumbered. He could only draw his sword out halfway because his arm had been injured by a bamboo spear. Here was how Pigafetta described what happened next:
“When the natives saw that, they all hurled themselves upon him. One of them wounded him on the left leg with a large cutlass, which resembles a scimitar, only being larger. That caused the captain to fall face downward, when immediately they rushed upon him with iron and bamboo spears and with their cutlasses, until they killed our mirror, our light, our comfort, and our true guide.”

So no, Magellan was not killed by a stab but by many stabs from bamboo spears and probably as many hacks using their cutlasses. Before being felled, he was shot through the leg with an arrow and was injured in the arm by a spear. Although already wounded, he continued to fight on and would look back every now and again at the boats to see that his men had already boarded and could flee the battle scene back to safety.

Pigafetta himself was wounded in the face by an arrow but survived to return to Spain and tell the world Magellan’s story. At no point during his narrative of the battle at Matan did he mention Magellan being felled by Cilapulapu, as many had believed from elementary Social Science. In fact, Pigafetta made no mention of Cilapulapu at all during his narration of the battle.

Of course, there were no introductory niceties between the two sides prior to battle; so Pigafetta could not have known who Cilapulapu was. At any rate, his narrative renders moot any further speculation about whether Magellan was indeed killed by Cilapulapu. The former was killed by multiple blows from men who had swarmed upon him.

Notes and references
1 An Historical View of the Philippine Islands by Joaquín Martínez de Zúñiga y Díaz de Ilarraza, Translated by John Maver.
2 Antonio Pigafetta, Wikipedia
3 Lapulapu, Wikipidia
4 Information about Magellan’s time at Zubu up to the battle at Matan from Antonio Pigafetta’s journal as published in the Blair and Robertson series The Philippine Islands, Volume 33
Next Post Previous Post