The Spanish Era Principalia of Batangas
The principalia was the dominant social class in the Philippines during the Spanish colonial period. The term itself came from the Spanish word principal, meaning “leading” or “chief.”
The concept of the principalia was not native to the islands, but the Spanish used it to refer to the local elite who served as intermediaries between colonial authorities and the native population.
In Batangas, as in other provinces, this class included the gobernadorcillo (town head), the cabezas de barangay (village heads), and their descendants — families who had earned prestige, land, and often a degree of education1.
The rise of the Batangueño principalia began in the 17th and 18th centuries, when local families accumulated land through the Spanish system of encomienda and mercedes (royal grants).
In the Spanish colonial Philippines, a merced (plural mercedes) was a grant of land, privileges, or rights given by the Spanish Crown to individuals, usually for service to the colonial government, the Church, or as rewards for loyalty.
These could include agricultural estates, grazing rights, exemption from certain taxes, or permission to collect tributes. In Batangas, mercedes often allowed local elites or principalia families to consolidate landholdings and secure economic and social dominance.
Some families gained influence through tax collection, tribute farming, and managing estates belonging to religious orders. The Augustinians, who administered much of Batangas, relied on these families to maintain local order2.
In towns such as Taal, Lipa, and Batangas City, principalia families became powerful not only through wealth but also through intermarriage. These alliances created strong kinship networks that allowed them to dominate municipal posts for generations.
The Marella, Noble, and Goco families in Taal; the Katigbak and Solis families in Lipa; and the Malabanan and Castillo clans in Batangas City were among those who rose to prominence3. They served as gobernadorcillos, town treasurers, and later as municipal presidents under the Americans.
The Spanish colonial government favored the principalia because they provided a reliable link between Manila and the localities. Members of the class were often granted exemptions from tribute, the right to wear European clothing, and seats at church near the altar — privileges that visually reinforced their higher status4.
They also had access to certain economic privileges such as low-interest loans and land leases. In a few cases, as Dante Simbulan notes, families received royal recognition or honorary titles for their loyalty to the Crown5.
Education was one of the most effective means of maintaining their position. Before the late 19th century, sons of the principalia were educated by friars or private tutors, and some were sent to Manila to study at institutions like the Colegio de San Juan de Letran or the University of Santo Tomas.
By the 1880’s, a few had even gone to Europe — part of the so-called ilustrado generation6. It was from among these educated elites that figures such as Miguel Malvar of Sto. Tomas and Teodoro Kalaw of Lipa emerged. Both were heirs to landed families, trained in Catholic schools, and steeped in civic duty7.
By the time of the Philippine Revolution in 1896, many Batangueño principalia were ambivalent. Some supported the revolutionaries, while others remained loyal to Spain, protecting their lands and privileges.
In the American colonial period, however, the class proved remarkably adaptable. Families that had once served the Spanish Crown now aligned themselves with the new colonial administration. They entered provincial politics, became municipal presidents, or sent their children into law, medicine, and business8.
Despite regime changes, the principalia of Batangas retained much of their social capital well into the 20th century. Greg Bankoff observed that their authority shifted from formal colonial titles to informal economic power — they continued to command respect as landowners, professionals, and patrons9.
Intermarriage between old elite families and rising professionals expanded their ranks, gradually diluting the exclusivity of the original principalia but preserving its cultural prestige.
Today, the legacy of this class remains visible in the province’s enduring family networks, civic traditions, and political lineages. While their role as intermediaries of empire has vanished, the old principalia mindset — deference to family name, education, and public service — still echoes in Batangas society.
2 “The Augustinian Order in the Philippines,” by John Schumacher, 1981, Philippine Studies.
3 “The Exercise of Power in a Nineteenth-Century Philippine Province,” by Greg Bankoff, 1992, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies.
4 “Philippine Social Structure under Spain,” by Nicholas Cushner, 1976, Ateneo de Manila University Press.
5 Simbulan, Op. cit.
6 “Education and the Ilustrado Class,” by Luis Camara Dery, 1997, National Historical Institute.
7 “Teodoro M. Kalaw: Scholar and Patriot,” by Esteban de Ocampo, 1964, Philippine Studies.
8 “Philippine Politics and Society in the Twentieth Century,” by Eva-Lotta Hedman and John Sidel, 2000, Routledge.
9 Bankoff, Op. cit.
