Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Batangas Fisherfolk
For centuries, Batangas fisherfolk have relied on their intimate knowledge of lakes and seas to sustain life and livelihood. This traditional ecological knowledge, built through lived experience and oral transmission across generations, encompasses observations of weather, seasonal rhythms, habitats, and species behavior.
It is knowledge that has allowed communities to adapt to changing tides and to survive environmental uncertainty long before the rise of modern fisheries science.
In coastal barangays such as Ilijan in Batangas City, elders recall practices of reading the sea through sensory cues — the scent of the air, the color of the horizon, or the particular tilt of the clouds before nightfall — to determine whether it was safe to go out to fish.
These cues served as a living calendar and barometer, shaping the fisherfolk’s daily rhythm and anchoring their resilience. Even inland, such as in the lakeside towns around Taal, ecological knowledge remains deeply rooted.
![]() |
| Above is an AI-generated image of fishermen mending nets on the beach. |
When fish kills struck the lake, communities relied on their collective memory of rainfall, wind direction, and water movement to explain the timing and severity of such events, insights that often matched or even anticipated scientific investigations1.
The knowledge of habitats also plays a vital role. Fisherfolk are well aware of the ecological functions of mangroves, seagrass, and coral reefs as nurseries and feeding grounds.
Such understanding has helped shape the placement of marine sanctuaries and protected areas in Batangas, where local inputs often determine which zones should be prioritized for conservation2.
Transmission of this wisdom follows familiar patterns of apprenticeship, as younger generations learn not from manuals but from long hours at sea alongside parents and elders. Oral tradition, storytelling, and daily labor together form a cultural school of ecology.
Yet this knowledge does not exist outside the pressures of modernity. Batangas fisherfolk today face shrinking catches and changing species composition.
Traditional targets like galunggong and tulingan no longer appear in abundance, forcing fishers to venture farther or adjust their gear.
Industrial developments along Batangas Bay — including power plants and fuel facilities — have altered coastal habitats, displacing traditional fishing grounds and at times excluding fishers altogether3.
In addition, the introduction of new technologies, such as cage culture systems and mechanical fish dryers, while promising improved incomes, can also disrupt long-established practices and reduce reliance on traditional cues4.
The erosion of traditional knowledge is not only ecological but generational. Younger BatangueƱos often seek other livelihoods, leaving behind the apprenticeship system that once ensured the continuity of ecological understanding.
The result is a gradual thinning of cultural memory, where fewer youth can read the sky or recall the spawning cycles of native fish.
This decline, however, is not inevitable. Community organizations and cooperatives, supported by NGOs and government programs, continue to document and apply fisherfolk knowledge to resource management.
Participatory mapping in Lobo, for example, has shown how fisherfolk can identify critical habitats and communication networks that are otherwise invisible to formal surveys5.
The challenge now is integration. Traditional ecological knowledge must not be seen as mere heritage but as a practical and adaptive body of information.
Programs in integrated coastal management in Batangas demonstrate that when Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) is considered alongside scientific data, management becomes more effective and legitimate in the eyes of local communities.
Fisherfolk insights into spawning grounds, weather patterns, and fish movement offer a nuanced, place-based perspective that can complement technical models and ensure compliance. At the same time, recognizing TEK affirms the dignity of fisherfolk as knowledge holders, not simply beneficiaries of external aid.
The resilience of Batangas communities lies not only in their ability to survive change but also in their capacity to adapt ancient wisdom to modern contexts. By documenting, respecting, and weaving traditional ecological knowledge into contemporary policy, Batangas ensures that the wisdom of its fisherfolk remains alive — not only as a memory of the past, but as a guide to a sustainable future.
2 “Enhancing Food Security and Sustainable Livelihoods in Batangas, Philippines, through MPAs and ICM,” PEMSEA, 2016, online at pemsea.org.
3 “Fisherfolk in Batangas go against the tide,” Salazar, C., 2023, Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism, online at rappler.com.
4 “Batangas fisherfolk upskilled on maliputo grow-out culture,” National Fisheries Research and Development Institute, 2024, Department of Agriculture, online at nfrdi.da.gov.ph.
5 “Communication Resource Mapping for Coastal Resources Management of Barangay Malabrigo, Lobo, Batangas, Philippines,” Lawas, T. P., Tirol, M. S. C., Cardenas, V. R., Jamias, S. B., 2009, Journal of Environmental Science and Management, online at uplb.edu.ph.
